Israel has been consistently attacked by people who use the civilian population of the gaza as human shields. The problem is, the forces entrenched in the gaza just don't want a lasting peace. They want a temporary peace, just long enough for hamas to regroup and attack Israel again, at hamas' leisure.
It's a horrible situation, but Israel is right to go after Hamas.
DEAR READERS: For your benefit, I will leave this comment submitted under the pseudonym, "Perplexity," stand as sufficiently self-exposing and self-answering.
Correct, I think, though I would like to see you elaborate your assessments in more explicit terms, being as prudent as you sense necessary given your context. (In short, I do not read texts with ellipses very well or take hints). I just finished a conversation, before turning to you comment, where I described the need to think in terms of multipolar games. The nebulous, shifting collection of controllers want to breed out (below self-sustainable levels) and kill as many Europeans as possible and then blend the more submissive races and ethnicities in order to gain absolute dominion over them. I challenge any reader to provide evidence that contradicts or weakens that hypothesis. With predominant influence over the powers available to them, macroscopically, they have effectively totalized control.
Thanks . I agree. Your observations about X and Musk , political divide and foreign war was rhetorical is how I took it. I will take some time later and write something more specific.
Thank you, Chris. I would like to be "on board" with the idea that Musk has created a space for intellectually honest, civil (and not necessarily "nice") and open discourse. I do not know that he promised that it could be a place for serious intellectual conversation---but he has signalled, as I have found out twice, that he does not seem up to the task for operating Twitter as such. The situation appears to me that Elon Musk has a gun pressed to the back of his head. I learned this shortly after his supposed takeover of Twitter, when I was trying to get the word about about the forensic-anatomical analysis in the case of Derek Chauvin and--now--in the case of my trying to help make people aware of the unjustified evil being perpretrated against the Palestinians---an evil as morally bad as anything that has happened in history. My message to Elon Musk is simple, respectful, and hopeful, "Come, Mr. Musk, come play with real thinkers and conversationalists."
Israel has been consistently attacked by people who use the civilian population of the gaza as human shields. The problem is, the forces entrenched in the gaza just don't want a lasting peace. They want a temporary peace, just long enough for hamas to regroup and attack Israel again, at hamas' leisure.
It's a horrible situation, but Israel is right to go after Hamas.
DEAR READERS: For your benefit, I will leave this comment submitted under the pseudonym, "Perplexity," stand as sufficiently self-exposing and self-answering.
Remnants of the cold war ...uni-polar / bi-polar desperation in rising multi polar world..
Musk's clear , thinly disguised alignment with establishment ...Raytheon Lockheed Martin ...mass formation psychosis ..
False binary . All things divisive virtue signal selectivity ...There is a theme running and it all makes sense just a little further out. Honestly.
Correct, I think, though I would like to see you elaborate your assessments in more explicit terms, being as prudent as you sense necessary given your context. (In short, I do not read texts with ellipses very well or take hints). I just finished a conversation, before turning to you comment, where I described the need to think in terms of multipolar games. The nebulous, shifting collection of controllers want to breed out (below self-sustainable levels) and kill as many Europeans as possible and then blend the more submissive races and ethnicities in order to gain absolute dominion over them. I challenge any reader to provide evidence that contradicts or weakens that hypothesis. With predominant influence over the powers available to them, macroscopically, they have effectively totalized control.
Thanks . I agree. Your observations about X and Musk , political divide and foreign war was rhetorical is how I took it. I will take some time later and write something more specific.
Thank you, Chris. I would like to be "on board" with the idea that Musk has created a space for intellectually honest, civil (and not necessarily "nice") and open discourse. I do not know that he promised that it could be a place for serious intellectual conversation---but he has signalled, as I have found out twice, that he does not seem up to the task for operating Twitter as such. The situation appears to me that Elon Musk has a gun pressed to the back of his head. I learned this shortly after his supposed takeover of Twitter, when I was trying to get the word about about the forensic-anatomical analysis in the case of Derek Chauvin and--now--in the case of my trying to help make people aware of the unjustified evil being perpretrated against the Palestinians---an evil as morally bad as anything that has happened in history. My message to Elon Musk is simple, respectful, and hopeful, "Come, Mr. Musk, come play with real thinkers and conversationalists."