Hello David, I saw your comments on MCM's board, which I am now banned on. Here are my comments that were deleted after Mark banned me.
You can now make your determination if they are beyond the pale or instructive.
Also included are screenshots of the first dialogue which Mark claims are "wild distortion."
You decide for yourself if they are at all distorted or accurately reflect his stated views, and highlight the disagreement that we have. The original roots of the dispute center around Bobby Kennedy taking a placation stance on the murderous rampage of forced bioweapons which Mark covers every week.
But Mark is friends with Bobby Kennedy, who I also had high hopes for, btw.
Mark and I have had numerous email exchanges about a variety of matters, by the way. He was one of my first paid subs and notable Stackers to recommend me.
The person that claims that I am an admitted drunk and "paid DOD troll" is nymusicdaily who I spent many hours helping to draft guest posts on my Stack.
I invited him to begin his own Stack but he did not want to do so as it requires identifying one self. I have probably hundreds of private email exchanges with him, as I helped him edit his posts for me.
I do not know why he is slandering me except that I can be confrontational and difficult, but that is a far cry from being a "paid DOD troll".
Though I am familiar with the moniker, "Sage Hana," I am not familiar with your perspectives on topics.
I will survey a bit of what you have posted. Also, I will ponder your comments to me.
In the meantime, I will set up at my American Siberia Substack, an article which I will -- at least temporarily -- designate as a place for comments. I will remove your comments in the Chauvin article because, I think you will understand, I want that article to remain focused on the topic of what I believe is an injustice done to those four police officers (one Black, b.t.w. --- but he doesn't count because he is a policeman and that is bad in the childish system of merit and demerit points that the Reigning Medium uses).
Commenting, especially at another person's site is a very tricky business --- but learning how to do so can be fun, as well. Mark Crispin Miller's advice to read more and rant less, is a good one for everyone engaged in public discourse.
I hope you have an enjoyable weekend in the meantime.
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/thats-a-wild-distortion-says-mark
-----
Hello David, I saw your comments on MCM's board, which I am now banned on. Here are my comments that were deleted after Mark banned me.
You can now make your determination if they are beyond the pale or instructive.
Also included are screenshots of the first dialogue which Mark claims are "wild distortion."
You decide for yourself if they are at all distorted or accurately reflect his stated views, and highlight the disagreement that we have. The original roots of the dispute center around Bobby Kennedy taking a placation stance on the murderous rampage of forced bioweapons which Mark covers every week.
But Mark is friends with Bobby Kennedy, who I also had high hopes for, btw.
Mark and I have had numerous email exchanges about a variety of matters, by the way. He was one of my first paid subs and notable Stackers to recommend me.
The person that claims that I am an admitted drunk and "paid DOD troll" is nymusicdaily who I spent many hours helping to draft guest posts on my Stack.
I invited him to begin his own Stack but he did not want to do so as it requires identifying one self. I have probably hundreds of private email exchanges with him, as I helped him edit his posts for me.
I do not know why he is slandering me except that I can be confrontational and difficult, but that is a far cry from being a "paid DOD troll".
I am indeed a long sober recovering alcoholic, so accurate on that front, nymusicdaily.
Though I am familiar with the moniker, "Sage Hana," I am not familiar with your perspectives on topics.
I will survey a bit of what you have posted. Also, I will ponder your comments to me.
In the meantime, I will set up at my American Siberia Substack, an article which I will -- at least temporarily -- designate as a place for comments. I will remove your comments in the Chauvin article because, I think you will understand, I want that article to remain focused on the topic of what I believe is an injustice done to those four police officers (one Black, b.t.w. --- but he doesn't count because he is a policeman and that is bad in the childish system of merit and demerit points that the Reigning Medium uses).
Commenting, especially at another person's site is a very tricky business --- but learning how to do so can be fun, as well. Mark Crispin Miller's advice to read more and rant less, is a good one for everyone engaged in public discourse.
I hope you have an enjoyable weekend in the meantime.
I understand completely. 👍